I could not get him to stop crying… and you did not answer your cell phone… so, I tried this!
No… I did not know I put the diaper on backwards too!
Sorrry!
But it DID make baby stop crying!!!
Sorry!
Nate
Probably used cords from the mini-blinds, or maybe tinsel from the Xmas tree. That’s OK, because it goes with the glass ornaments seen on display here…
If you are hungry, pull the upside-down dog. If you need a diaper change, pull the Dr. Seuss looking creature with the swiss chard coming out of it’s head and the carrot protruding from its chest. If you are tired, pull the plastic ball. For a trip to the hospital, pull all three at once. The naked mole rat on the floor next to you will be installed tomorrow.
As long as the stroller stays level, the contraption should not be a hazard.
Oh, that’s assuming that the toys are age-appropriate. Maybe they are,
maybe they aren’t.
As for the stroller staying level — I don’t see a bucket of sand in the seat,
so probably it won’t stay level for long. There’s also a question of whether
the strings are attached well enough. They should withstand at least 2x the
toddler weight on a pull test, and that’d be cutting it too close IMHO.
So, in itself there’s nothing wrong with this contraption, but the particular
example we see here is more than likely to be rather unsafe…
This is actually dangerous, that baby can pull one of those cords down and strangle itself accidentally, please E-mail whoever provided this photo and let them know. This website is better when it’s adults who should know better.
If they’re dumb enough to put their child in real danger, they’re dumb enough that they shouldn’t breed, taking a chance of passing on their defective genes. These are the same people who are the reason for warning labels of even the most obvious danger. I stuck a hair pin in a light socket when I was two years old. It didn’t affect me at all affect me at all.
If you look closely, you will see that the stroller appears to not have its back wheels on the floor; at least one is instead up on a cushion or a piece of furniture with the baby. So no comfort worries for anyone…until junior Kludge goes careening down onto the tile. And not to worry re: strangulation, either, because odds are good that there probably won’t be time for that. I think they’re counting too much on the dog to break the inevitable fall here. But you’re right– that floor surely does look hard!
Safety Naysayers: Having seen this contraption in person and knowing the kid, my nephew, well, I can assure you it’s safe. Said child appears to be a toddler, but is actually only 4 months old: he’s a good eater. He’s not capable of much more movement than raising an arm and bumping one of these toys–certainly not pulling himself up to strangle or pulling the stroller over on top of himself.
Gee, what are the chances that the person taking this picture is going to keep the baby from getting strangled or run over…Yes, email this person and let them know it’s dangerous…oh yeah, they’re the one taking the picture.
Junior had almost perfected his doomsday device; with the addition of the final toy, the stroller would hover, then bring down a hail of death rays on his unfortunate captors….
I could not get him to stop crying… and you did not answer your cell phone… so, I tried this!
No… I did not know I put the diaper on backwards too!
Sorrry!
But it DID make baby stop crying!!!
Sorry!
Nate
Errrr, well, so what ????
awesome kludge…
Looks about as safe as anything from China these days.
Hope they put the stroller brake on…
Raise your arms if you want to be our new safety spokesperson.
This is an example at how the predator, Strollerkludge-erectus, evolved an ingenious ways to attract its prey.
Aren’t those strings a little long or are we also trying for strangulation in case the kid doesn’t get crushed by the stroller’s wheels?
Probably used cords from the mini-blinds, or maybe tinsel from the Xmas tree. That’s OK, because it goes with the glass ornaments seen on display here…
Baby learns important, practical lesson on first-class levers in 3…2…1…
Silly, that’s what the bowling ball on the seat is for.
If you are hungry, pull the upside-down dog. If you need a diaper change, pull the Dr. Seuss looking creature with the swiss chard coming out of it’s head and the carrot protruding from its chest. If you are tired, pull the plastic ball. For a trip to the hospital, pull all three at once. The naked mole rat on the floor next to you will be installed tomorrow.
I like this. What are kids, anyway, but an unending series of psychological experiments? I mean, if you DON’T cause their demise at a very early age.
As long as the stroller stays level, the contraption should not be a hazard.
Oh, that’s assuming that the toys are age-appropriate. Maybe they are,
maybe they aren’t.
As for the stroller staying level — I don’t see a bucket of sand in the seat,
so probably it won’t stay level for long. There’s also a question of whether
the strings are attached well enough. They should withstand at least 2x the
toddler weight on a pull test, and that’d be cutting it too close IMHO.
So, in itself there’s nothing wrong with this contraption, but the particular
example we see here is more than likely to be rather unsafe…
I think you’re missing the point of this website.
Bungie chord training for little Bubba.
Octomom soon to become Septomom.
They’ll have to get new numbered t-shirts made. Go team!
This is actually dangerous, that baby can pull one of those cords down and strangle itself accidentally, please E-mail whoever provided this photo and let them know. This website is better when it’s adults who should know better.
If they’re dumb enough to put their child in real danger, they’re dumb enough that they shouldn’t breed, taking a chance of passing on their defective genes. These are the same people who are the reason for warning labels of even the most obvious danger. I stuck a hair pin in a light socket when I was two years old. It didn’t affect me at all affect me at all.
This is actually a win for the mom on the go.
Holding this child’s attention for 3-2-1…
In a bind this might be a good idea for a mom but it doesnt look comfortable. The floor looks so hard.
If you look closely, you will see that the stroller appears to not have its back wheels on the floor; at least one is instead up on a cushion or a piece of furniture with the baby. So no comfort worries for anyone…until junior Kludge goes careening down onto the tile. And not to worry re: strangulation, either, because odds are good that there probably won’t be time for that. I think they’re counting too much on the dog to break the inevitable fall here. But you’re right– that floor surely does look hard!
Good grief, imagine all the cats that will follow this down the street.
Just toss ‘em a cheezburger.
My stroller brings all the cats to the yard.
This isn’t what “alternative transportation” was supposed to be by any means.
I see a new warning label in all strollers’ futures.
Safety Naysayers: Having seen this contraption in person and knowing the kid, my nephew, well, I can assure you it’s safe. Said child appears to be a toddler, but is actually only 4 months old: he’s a good eater.
He’s not capable of much more movement than raising an arm and bumping one of these toys–certainly not pulling himself up to strangle or pulling the stroller over on top of himself.
Gee, what are the chances that the person taking this picture is going to keep the baby from getting strangled or run over…Yes, email this person and let them know it’s dangerous…oh yeah, they’re the one taking the picture.
Junior had almost perfected his doomsday device; with the addition of the final toy, the stroller would hover, then bring down a hail of death rays on his unfortunate captors….